Archive for the 'Amusing' Category

Ten ways to increase traffic to your blog

Looking for an easy way to increase traffic to your website? Simply follow one or more of these steps to see a dramatic change in your hits!

  1. Pretend that you are expert of some kind, and write a blog entry on how to increase traffic to your blog. The fact that your girlfriend is the only one who reads your blog is immaterial.
  2. Find a colorful, festive way to off yourself. In your will, nominate yourself for a Darwin Award. Be sure to include the URL to your blog in your nomination (you won’t believe how many people forget that part).
  3. Attempt some sort of criminal activity in which you are embarrassingly foiled by someone who wears diapers. For example, being beaten senseless with dentures wielded by a 93 year old man in a wheelchair, whom you were trying to mug. When being put into the police car, yell out the URL for your blog. Fark will pick the story up immediately.
  4. Per Wil Shipley, simply add the phrase “Kyle orton drunk”, and you will be rolling in hits.
  5. In the late 90′s start a blog with an obscure, technical name. Post links to technical news, anime, and other geekery. Later, the unemployed and/or students who love Linux and not paying for stuff you might be advertising, will flock to your site and remove any value it might have had.
  6. Create a blog with a name that’s a derivative of a curse word. Until you have actual content to put up, use a placeholder that is a picture of a squirrel with a peculiar glandular problem. Later, post links about criminals getting beaten up by 93 year olds in wheelchairs.
  7. Read the hundreds of posts on how to increase traffic to your site, and determine that that’s too much work. Instead, write about what your cat, Mittens, threw up this morning. Despite the odds, cat lovers will flock to your site, eager to tell you how cute that is, and what their cat just left in the litter-box.
  8. Browse over to Dave Barry’s blog to get ideas. Think, “I could have a much better haircut than that!” Scoff at his writing since he retired. Pretend that its your blog.
  9. Find a way to insult Muslims and/or the Koran, such as drawing a cartoon. Have a well-known cleric declare a jihad on you. In a press release, mention your exact location will be posted daily on your blog. Watch the death threats, erm traffic, roll in.
  10. Write an article on how this will be “The Year of Linux” and how much better it will be than Windows. Be sure to abbreviate Microsoft as M$ a lot. Post it where the unemployed and/or students can find it. Prepare to be slashdotted.

Some of these might even be legal in your state!

Digg vs Netscape: The plight of the users

Lately there’s been a lot of hoopla and fussing about Netscape’s proposal to attract and keep top Digg submitters by offering them money. Kevin Rose of Digg and others argue that people contribute to Digg because they enjoy it. On the other hand, Jason Calacanis of Netscape argues that the top submitters make the site, and therefore they should be paid for their work, and please, for the love of Pete, pay attention to him for once. This debate has gone on ad nauseam, but has yet to end. Mainly because Calacanis hasn’t run out of dumb things to say, and I haven’t had a chance to get my two cents in.

What people have failed to ask so far is: what does the consumer think? There are countless internet users who have not had the chance to weigh in on this all important issue, some of whom actually have actually heard of these two sites. In order to facilitate this discussion, I will speak for the consumers. No need to thank me, I accept large cash donations.

The first question on every consumer’s mind is: “who are we talking about again?” Despite the very public sparing of two unknown geeks on their personal blogs, not many people have heard of these sites. So the first step in helping consumers weigh in is to let them know what they’re fighting about, and to make fun of some websites that have more visitors than me.

Digg is a relatively new Web 2.0 company*. Despite their name and logo, they will not install a new underground pool for you, so you can put the phone down now. Digg is a website that allows users to see what stories are currently “hot” in the technology world. Although this might sound similar to Slashdot or something else you won’t care about, I can assure you it is totally different in who gets all the money. Unlike the totalitarian regime imposed on Slashdot by CmdrTaco (Is he really a commander? Is he really a taco?), users of Digg can actually submit and vote on stories they like. This is the allegedly “social” part of the website, which should give you an inkling of much SPF they require in their sunscreen. If a lot of people “digg” a story, then it gets moved to the front page. Instead of having stories decided by an editor, they are decided on by people who like to click shiny, gradient filled buttons and see their names on the front page of a geek website.

The Netscape name has been around for longer than most people can remember, let alone tolerate. Throughout its history, people have been amazed at Netscape’s ability to create products they desperately don’t need. Whether it be a web browser, server software, a web portal, a low cost ISP, or a rip off of Digg, people have responded resoundingly with the click of their web browsers. And they have said: “Didn’t these guys used to have a browser?” In Netscape’s recent bid to get attention, they have cloned Digg, and created many innovations based on what was already there. Their main innovations being: changing the word “Digg” to “Vote” and not having any users.

The next question most consumers will have is: “what’s in it for me?” Consumers are busy emailing that latest chain letter from Bill Gates to their grandmother, and will want to know why either site deserves their attention. Sure Netscape wants to pay the top submitters, but how about the people who just read these sites or frequently ignore them? How much they are worth? Sadly, not much research has been done in this area. I could only find one article, titled YouTube, Digg, MySpace: How much is a non-paying ‘user’ worth?. I would have found more, but it was the only one posted on Digg. Readers of this article will be impressed by the author’s ability quote herself repeatedly, not answer the question that she herself posed, and to refer to consumers who might just click on a banner ad as “freeloaders.”

It is clear from this article that more research needs to be done. Consumers cannot make such important decisions like which free news-aggregation web site to visit on so little information. I volunteer to take this on, and I can assure you I have the integrity of John C Dvorak. Up until this point neither Digg or Netscape have been giving me any money. I propose that they both start giving me money, and then I can decide if I’m more likely to visit their site or even click on banner ads or not. For phase two, they could give me more money, and then I judge if that increases their chances any. This is vital to the scientific process.

Finally, customers will want to know “Does the roe over Digg and Netscape mean we’re going to see a nerd slap fight?” Yes, but only in the virtual sense. I’m guessing both Kevin and Jason bruise easily and will avoid a physical confrontation and direct sunlight. Although, Jason might have other plans since his recent declaration of love for Kevin. Who knows, maybe this is just the prelude of Netscape being the latest clone of Match.com.

* Web 2.0 means they don’t make any actual “money”.

For the Love of the Game

Grabblin, aka noodling, is the latest craze to be called a “semi-aquatic activity.” But don’t be fooled, it only occurs half in the water.

For the uninitiated, grabblin occurs when a person, the grabblinee, swims around in lakes, rivers, or a 7-Eleven Big Gulp, jamming their hand into any hole they find. Why? Because there might a water moccasin, snapping turtle, or a catfish in the hole, and it would be downright rude not to offer them a bite of the grabblinee’s hand. The idea, apparently, is to lose your entire hand. Unfortunately, the snapping turtles usually just bite off a few fingers and the snakes just inject massive amounts of venom. Neither truly bite off the entire hand, although sometimes the snake’s venom makes it fall off. But that’s only a technical win, not a true win in the real sense of the word. Until they are reduced to a nub for a hand, the grabblinee must continue shoving his or her hand into random holes.

The team version is much the same, but with increased chances of someone drowning.

On the off chance a catfish bites the hand, the shocked grabblinee will immediately surface with it, and hold it aloft in order to save it from drowning. The catfish, approximately the size of a small Buick, is rife with excitement. As a reward for being rescued, the fish performs his favorite Monty Python skit, namely, The Fish Slapping Dance. Clearly, the catfish feels as if he was born to play the part of John Cleese.

Although the origins of this game are shrouded in secrecy, I’m convinced that grabblin was invented by fathers who have daughters. Its not easy to weed out the dumb suitors, but this “semi-aquatic activity” makes it considerably easier. I would imagine the father/daughter conversation would go something like this:

Daughter: Daddy, Daddy, Jeb just asked me to marry him!

Father: How many fingers does he have?

Daughter: (lowers head) Three.

Father: You know know what that means.

Daughter: Yes Daddy.

Father: (retrieving shotgun)

Daughter: (taking shotgun) No Daddy, he’s my boyfriend.

If you’re the sensitive type, then I can assure you this scene ends nothing like Old Yeller. Except for the part where someone sympathetic, yet doomed, is shot. That happens.

Now if you’re like me, at this point you’re wondering why the authorities haven’t gotten involved. Well, fear not, PETA (motto: Ruining one dinner at a time) has gotten involved. No, seriously. These animals suffer severe emotional distress. The catfish alone become despondent when they discover what they thought were worms are actually just the fingers of someone with nothing else better to do, and that they, in fact, cannot breathe air. PETA has learned, that as a result of this, the catfish spend the rest of their lives at the bottom, scavenging on dead fish.

Undoubtedly, PETA will take action to stop these travesties. In unlikely event that writing angry unread letters, fighting for catfish suffrage, and chaining themselves to random pieces of wildlife don’t work, they are willing to travel all the way to their sidewalk to protest. You can’t travel far when you’re chained to a moose. Which is probably for the best, since the meeting of PETA and a grabblinee would probably turn ugly if that ever happened:

Jeb: (holding up a catfish) He’s a beaut, ain’t he Jethro?

Jethro: Yep, sure is.

Trevor: Cease and desist immediately! You’re causing that poor animal emotional distress!

Jeb: …

Jethro: …

Jeb: Um, no. He’s dead. See? They can’t breathe air.

Jethro: Really? Huh.

Trevor: How would you like it if someone did that to you??

Jeb: Well, I can breathe air so…

Trevor: You’re barbarians! Killing animals for any reason is senseless!

Jeb: Look fella, I ain’t the one chained to a moose.

Trevor: That’s for his own protection!

Jeb: Well now, that’s just silly. If you want protection, you need one of these. (Jeb pulls out a shotgun)

Moose: (spooked by the gun) HHHHOOOOONNNKKKK!!!!

(The moose tears off through the woods, trampling poor Trevor.)

Jeb: Wow. That worked out better than I thought.

Jethro: Yep. High three!

However, despite PETA’s best efforts grabblin shows no signs of abating. When asked if they were concerned about further interference from PETA, several grabblinee’s said “No, the moose sorta took care of that for us.” It appears grabblin, and the moose, are here to stay.

So the next time your sitting around on your front porch, playing Russian Roulette, and think “I wish there was something like this, but for under water”, think of grabblin. Its the perfect hobby for people with too much time, alcohol, and/or fingers.